Syedna Taher Fakhruddin, the plaintiff in the Syedna succession case, on Wednesday refuted the claim of defendant Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin, that the 52nd Dai had conferred a valid nass on him on four occasions from 1969 to June 20, 2011, and submitted that the audio recording of the June 4, 2011 nass played before the Bombay high court earlier was not reliable.
Read more at Hindustan Times: ‘Audio recording of nass popped up from nowhere, not reliable’