The final hearing of the Syedna succession case, which started on November 28, saw defendant Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin’s counsels make an emphatic case before the Bombay high court that witnesses were required for confirming conferment of a valid nass. The original plaintiff had cited instances of private nass to prove that the December 10, 1965 nass conferred on him was valid, said the counsels—however, all these instances, though private, had witnesses.
Read more at Hindustan Times: First round of final arguments concluded, second round from Jan 11