Defendant Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin’s counsel, during the final hearing of the Syedna succession case in the Bombay high court, claimed that doctrinally, nass, once conferred, could be revoked or changed, as evidenced by the writings and actions of not only the previous Dais but the Imams as well. The court was further told that only the last nass conferred by the Dai at the end of his life was doctrinally considered a valid nass, thus refuting the claim of the plaintiff that only the first nass was a valid one.
Read more at Hindustan Times: Last nass, not first one, is valid: defence counsel