Fredun Di’Vitre, counsel for defendant Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin, on Friday informed the Bombay high court that the claim of the plaintiffs, Syedna Khuzaima Qutbuddin and Syedna Taher Fakhruddin, that no conferred nass was revoked during the time of the 25th Dai was due to scribal errors in the manuscripts of authoritative books.
Read more at Hindustan Times: Mix-up in names by scribes led to confusion on revocation of nass: Defendant