Fredun Di’Vitre, counsel for respondent Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin, while replying to the plaintiff’s rejoinder that he had adopted taqiyyah (concealing one’s faith and beliefs) about the nass conferred on him, said that the original plaintiff could not take a dual stand in the garb of taqiyyah. Di’Vitre submitted that on the one hand the plaintiff claimed that he did not believe that nass had been conferred on the defendant on June 4 and 20, 2011 but on the other hand, had continued to remain silent about the nass conferred on himself.
Read more at Hindustan Times: Original plaintiff’s claims of concealing belief were belied by his actions