The counsel for the defendant in the Syedna Succession case, informed the Bombay high court (HC) on Friday that instances of revocation of nass in the past had been based on the prevailing circumstances but only the final nass was the valid nass. The defendant clarified that once a final nass was conferred it could not have been changed and hence the contention of the plaintiff that the nass conferred on him in 1965 was valid and the subsequent nass on the defendant in June 2011 were not valid could not hold true.
Read more at Hindustan Times: Past instances prove that only final nass of succession is valid